It’s
been a couple months since I’ve written on here, and I can tell you it’s not
because I’ve stopped writing. It’s mostly because I’ve stopped traveling! Only
temporarily, however. As I’ve told many of you, I’m most inspired to write when
I’m outside of my Southeastern Pennsylvanian hometown and immersed in new, fascinating cultures. I have indeed continued
writing, it’s just the majority of my writing has been for the classes I’m
taking to complete my Masters in mental health counseling. I’ll be exactly
halfway through my program after this semester, which means that I can finally
look forward to actual counseling within the next year or two, not just
convincing inebriated customers at the pizzeria that no, just because you got
kicked out of ---insert bar name here---, your life isn’t over.
So,
why am I blogging now? Well, it’s mostly because the content I’m about to share
with you is the same follow up email I sent to a doctorate student completing a research
dissertation. That means less writing for me, and more knowledge for you, like
I just cracked a double egg (for every two birds killed with one
stone, a double egg is birthed). It was through this research dissertation that
I was reminded of a subject that effects every one of us, every single day.
Anyone
going to school for psychology, counseling or any scientific profession for that matter can
relate to the hundreds of emails we receive monthly to participate in X
research project for a group of doctorate students at X university. Traditionally,
I delete many of these emails without even looking at the content. Either I was
really bored this day or my cat somehow managed to open up gmail, because I somehow read the subject of the research, “Process of How Men Encounter Their Gender
in Counselor Education”, and thought, “Hmm, how do I see myself as an aspiring
male counselor in a room filled with 75% females?” It’s nothing new to me, as
JMU classes were roughly 60% female, but as many of you could guess, counseling
is a profession filled predominantly with woman, so that compounds the ratio,
not to mention my current school was exclusively female up until 2005. Any who,
I emailed back the sender of that email and after a brief, casual interview
style phone call, they determined I was in fact a good fit for the study.
You
may be curious as to what my “participation” in the research has been like thus
far in the process. It’s been pretty simple, actually. Once they determined
that I was a good fit I electronically signed a confidentiality agreement and
we then met up via video chat and spoke for about an hour, myself answering
questions from the principal investigator in a free flow style conversation. Soon
after, I sent the investigator an email just to relay some thoughts about the
subject material of the research, nothing specifically about the actual research being conducted, but more of a reflection on my experience. Here’s that email (As far as I know, sharing
this isn’t at all breaching the confidentiality agreement I signed. I read that agreement,
several times):
Participating
in this study has actually helped me understand my own story in a more personal
and enriching manner, while also providing me insight into the process of
conducting actual, meaningful research. You could compare it to construction,
for example. Unless you’ve had the specific experience of helping to build a bridge, you will
never fully appreciate, or understand how that bridge was built.
I
thought it was interesting, and quite paradoxical, how myself and my classmate used the words aggressive
and passive to define each other. Just by saying aggressive, that lady came off
as aggressive, and by me saying “passive”, it may have seemed like I was being
passive aggressive. However, I was merely making a point, although many may have viewed me as being aggressive simply because thats how the other student choose to categorize me. See what I am getting at here? This was also the point of
the TRUE pizzeria story I shared in that email. That's a prime example of how
these passive/aggressive characteristics are attributed easily to both genders.
Often
times what ends up happening is the words we use to describe people, or the way we perpetuate others, is usually
what leads to their self-concept of themselves. If you constantly tell a child
they are no good, well, they are going to believe you and end up, “no good”. As
one of my friends said in a discussion recently, “Look at the way we stereotype drug addicts as violent. No wonder they act out aggressively and
often end up in jail.” Its not a coincidence that countries like Ireland and
Denmark have an extremely more effective prison and rehabilitation system for
these types of people. Those countries don’t label these people violent users,
but instead, people who choose to use drugs. We pathologize our drug users to the
extent that they are seen as monsters who cannot, will not, fit into our society. I
think this stigma, along with the gender stigma, is slowly, yet surely
changing, but it takes acknowledging these stigmas in order to go about
changing them.
In
order to move forward as a society, I believe each person needs to be viewed as
an entire, complete person. Not based off their gender, religion, sexual
orientation or income. Not based off stereotypes ether. People need to realize that you can’t tell who a person
is just by looking at them. You find out who a person is by having a
conversation with them and getting to know them. Although I’d like to love and
treat everybody the same, I can’t, because their gender, their diversity, their
identity, dictates how they see me, in a potentially much, much different way then how I see them.
